Does the future of energy involve nuclear power?

Between the promise of a carbon neutral world and the reality of electrical sockets, there is an energy system that hates slogans.

We want an “ON” button for winter, stable prices for households, and zero CO₂ for the planet. In fact, you have to compose, you need instruments that can be ordered on demand (nuclear power plants, dams, geothermal energy...), weather-dependent energies (wind, solar), storage (batteries and tanks that keep up), networks (electricity highways), networks (electricity highways) and a bit of sobriety (stop running the machine for nothing).

Introduction: At 50 hertz, the country breathes

One winter evening, demand spiked. In a control room, your eyes remain fixed on the network frequency, that 50 hertz heartbeat that should not falter. If there is not enough wind, the sun is already asleep. We then call what answers immediately, dam hydraulics, geothermal when we have them, and nuclear, the silent backbone. The rest of the time, as soon as the sun hits and the wind comes up, we fill the batteries, we export, we reinforce the lines. It's a symphony orchestra, not an electric guitar solo. Without harmony between these controllable, intermittent, stored and intelligently managed sources, everything collapses.

What complicates everything is that the climate does not read press releases. It counts what we're broadcasting now. However, each technology comes with its share of constraints, carbon over the entire life cycle, guaranteed power, different time scales, and above all a “system” cost that exceeds the simple price per kilowatt hour displayed. We need raw materials (copper, lithium, uranium, rare earths), water, lines to build, deadlines to meet, social acceptability to gain, and on the demand side, smart economies to activate.

At the heart of this puzzle is a burning question: does the future of energy involve nuclear power? Is it the indispensable backbone of tomorrow's energy mix, or simply one pillar among others, to be balanced with bold alternatives? In a world where 31 countries have committed to tripling their nuclear capacity by 2050 in order to achieve carbon neutrality, this debate is no longer theoretical.

It is a question of anticipating in order to build, not to suffer. We will explore the realities of today, concrete advances by 2030, new reactors and the role of networks and storage, the contrasting scenarios for 2050 with three credible paths, each with its strengths and compromises, and then we will raise our heads to 2100 and beyond, where fusion, super-deep geothermal and space solar could change the scale of the game.

But first, let's dive into today's reality, before dreaming tomorrow.

Today: the reality that everyone agrees on

Current constraints

The energy reality makes everyone agree, whether you are pro-nuclear or a fan of solar panels. It does not burden itself with ideals, it imposes its rules, implacable.

Carbon, first of all. Climate is counting emissions now, not in a vague future. Each technology has an imprint on its entire life cycle, extraction, manufacturing, transport, end of life. A solar panel or a wind turbine emits little during operation, but their production consumes concrete, steel and metals, and if additional gas is used during dips, CO₂ is introduced.

Then, produce when you need it, not just on an annual average. Imagine a peak in demand at 6 pm, with no wind or sun. The weather-dependent energies shine by their intermittency, forcing rapid responses. This is the challenge of guaranteed power, where the system must juggle between peak hours and seasonal lows. Batteries for a few hours, but to get through the whole winter, not so simple. Time scales complicate everything, lithium-ion batteries manage the hours, for days or weeks, you need hydro or hydrogen tanks, which are still emerging.

Materials and space matter. A more electric world requires more copper, lithium, nickel, magnets, and surfaces. Space too, a solar farm takes up square kilometers, where a reactor packs everything on a stadium.

Water and extreme heat. Power plants requiring cooling, nuclear as well as fossil thermal, are sensitive to droughts, resulting in the choice of sites and cooling technologies adapted to the future climate. Conversely, wind and solar power consume very little water during operation.

Networks, these invisible highways. The more we rely on the weather, the more lines we need to transport electricity from windy or sunny areas to cities, and long-distance connections to share hazards. Without a grid, clean energy gets stuck.

The calendar is money. Between the idea and the plug that works, there are permits, construction sites, connections. A large structure takes years to emerge from the ground, a solar park goes faster but requires ready lines and flexibility in front of it.

And everywhere, local acceptance. Landscape, noise, safety, biodiversity, waste, nothing can be built sustainably without trust and value sharing.

Finally, demand. The cheapest and cleanest kilowatt hour is the one that is not produced, insulation, fine control of heating, staggered industrial processes, intelligent vehicle charging.

In the background, a reality is emerging, with hotter summers and more frequent droughts, it will sometimes be necessary to pivot quickly, adapt the sites, reinforce the lines, change the storage scale. These constraints weigh on all technologies, including nuclear power, which offers its advantages, but not without snags.

Nuclear power today

Imagine a maintenance visit to a power plant, the smell of hot metal, an operator in combination checks his checklist, valves and sensors. It is a continuous service that delivers a lot of electricity in a small space, a reactor occupies the equivalent of a stadium, but supplies an entire city, 24 hours a day, without depending on the wind or the sun. With around 420 reactors in operation around the world and nearly 10% of the world's electricity produced, nuclear power stabilizes networks in the face of intermittent renewables. Controllable backbone, zero emissions over the life cycle, reliable for winter peaks.

But nothing is magic. Construction sites often last 5-10 years, hampered by draconian safety regulations (essential after lessons like Fukushima) but which inflate costs and deadlines.

Waste management is operationally controlled, but social consensus on long-term geological storage remains to be built. Heat waves make cooling more difficult, leading to the rise of more complex air-cooling towers. Site security and the strain on qualified skills are limiting factors.

Extend or rebuild. Many countries are extending their fast, well-known, low-carbon reactors. Rebuilding something new prepares for the following decade, relaunching a sector, industrializing, securing the supply chain. The two coexist, we extend to get through the winters, we rebuild for the long term.

The daily life of a power plant involves precision maintenance, inspections, fuel recharging, and redundant tests. The scheduled stops are millimeter marathons. It is these invisible actions that transform technology into reliability.

Where nuclear power excels, provide a lot of electricity continuously, stabilize a highly renewable network, decarbonize industrial processes. Where it stalls, when you have to go very fast, when local acceptance is fragile, or when cooling water becomes the limiting factor.

‍

Short term — 2030

New reactors: EPR2, SMR and microreactors

Nuclear power is not just about extending existing power plants. It is also an attempt to reinvent the sector with new generations of reactors. Behind the acronyms are three different approaches: EPR2, SMRs (Small Modular Reactors) and microreactors.

EPR2: the streamlined juggernaut.
The Flamanville EPR crystallized criticism, additional costs and delays. The EPR2 version aims for a simplified and standardized design, to build more quickly and better control costs, with high-power reactors, around 1.6 GW.

In France, EDF is planning six EPR2 on sites such as Penly, Gravelines and Bugey. The first would not come into service until 2038, making it a long-term response more than 2030. The key challenge is not physics, it's industrial execution and ramp-up.

‍
SMR: the “small modular reactors”.
From 50 to 300 MW, designed to be mass-produced in the factory, “turnkey” modules, installation in 3 to 4 years once the supply chain has been established. Uses, medium-sized cities, industrial sites, data centers. Nuward in France, and projects in the United States, Canada, Poland.

Interest, bringing production closer to uses, reducing construction site risk, but it is necessary to build factories, train teams and secure the supply chain.

‍

Micro-reactors: the ultra-compact.

Microreactors take the idea further from 1 to 10 MW, they imagine themselves as autonomous “nuclear batteries”, with fuel that lasts 10-20 years without recharging.

Prototypes exist, often for military or space use. In civilian life, we talk about it to supply remote mines, islands, or sensitive installations with concepts without water for cooling.

The American NRC is refining the licensing rules for these “little guys”, noting that their intrinsic safety, small size and intrinsic physics greatly limit the risks of core fusion. Imagine an engineer in Alaska, plugging in a micro-reactor like a diesel generator, but without emissions or fuel to import: that's creativity at work, to decarbonize the remote corners where solar and wind power struggle in winter.

“SMRs won't replace everything, but they will fill in the holes that intermittent renewables leave.”

These new generations want to respond to the big reproach of nuclear power: too long, too expensive, too rigid. In theory, a mass-produced SMR could leave the factory like an Airbus. But first you have to... build factories, train teams, secure the supply chain. Otherwise, the risk is to replicate the same timeframes, simply on a smaller scale.

The real question in the short term is therefore: can nuclear power be brought into a modular and rapid way, in the same way as renewable energies, without losing the guarantees of safety and reliability?

Networks and Storage: The invisible links in the system

Without a solid network and smart storage, even the best energy sources (nuclear included) remain empty promises.

High-voltage lines are the invisible energy highways: they transport power from windy or sunny areas to cities, they pool the surpluses of one region to compensate for the lows of another. But expanding these highways is not easy: you need copper, transformers, kilometers of cables... and the support of local residents. Without them, the system stalls.

In 2025, Europe is accelerating with projects such as the North Sea Wind Power Hub, connecting offshore farms to several countries to share weather hazards. In France, RTE is investing 100 billion euros by 2040 to strengthen the network, with submarine cables and interconnections (as with Spain or Germany) to export nuclear surpluses or import Iberian solar energy. AI improves forecasts and the optimization of flows, it reduces losses and congestions.

Besides that, you need a memory. Because electricity is not stored naturally: it circulates or it disappears. This memory is divided into temporal layers:

- The batteries (a few hours): perfect for spending the evening when the sun has set, but expensive to last longer.

- Hydraulics (days to weeks): reservoirs remain our natural “giant batteries”, but their potential is limited in Europe.

- Hydrogen and thermal storage (weeks to seasons): still emerging, they promise to overcome prolonged windless winters.

With creativity (such as “virtual power plants” where millions of home batteries are synchronized via AI, or even flexible uses to absorb surpluses — such as intensive computing or supervised Bitcoin mining transforming excess into value), we can transform the system into a self-regulating orchestra.

Precisely, let's explore these clever optimizations that complement storage by recycling energy in a different way.

Optimizations on the demand side and valorization of surpluses

The good news is that you don't have to solve everything by offering. We can also take action on the consumption side:
- industrial erasure: to postpone the production of a factory when the network is under tension,
- building management: heating a little earlier or later, depending on the availability of energy,
- electric vehicles: intelligent charging, or even returning some energy when they sleep in car parks.

But what if we connected our surpluses to... Bitcoin miners?
In the same spirit, surpluses can be connected to Bitcoin mining operators. This activity can start quickly, stop in a second, and move as close as possible to pockets of excess energy. It absorbs kilowatt hours that would be lost, is erased as soon as the network needs everything and monetizes isolated sites (dams far from cities, geothermal energy without customers).

The framework must be clear, aim at areas of surplus, congestion or isolated sites; give absolute priority to the network with immediate cancellation in case of tension; be transparent about the carbon mix and intensity; control noise and heat (which can also be recovered); assume the transitory nature as soon as a line arrives or the surplus disappears, we fold the containers and we move.

Under these conditions, mining is like an economical battery with no physical storage, but value created from orphaned electrons. Well equipped, it integrates into the range of flexibilities alongside industrial erasures, controlled buildings and intelligent electric mobility. Deserves dedicated development;)

‍

Medium term - Horizon 2050

By 2050, electricity is becoming the backbone of the economy, mobility, data centers, AI, electrolysis, heat pumps. According to the reference trajectories, global nuclear capacity could increase from around 416 GWe in 2023 to nearly 647 GWe in 2050 under a current policy scenario, more so in more ambitious trajectories.

There is no single path. Here are three contrasting scenarios, one where nuclear power plays the controllable backbone, one where renewables dominate with strong network-storage support, and a mixed scenario where we orchestrate everything together for unfailing resilience.

“Nuclear Backbone” Scenario

The decade 2035—2045 will be like a long assembly line. These are no longer single gigantic projects, but series, same tanks, same valves, same procedures, duplicated from site to site. In this vision, the large reactors launched in Europe and Asia are setting the pace while SMRs leave the factory in clusters to power medium-sized cities, industrial centers or data centers hungry by AI. We standardize, we repeat, we learn, and we accelerate.

The starting point is factual, in its World Energy Outlook 2024, the IEA projects a world with around 647 GWe nuclear in 2050 if current policies are followed. Our scenario goes further, between 800 and 1,000 GWe if orders really follow the commitment made by 31 countries since COP28 to triple global capacity by 2050. The difference is not ideological, it is industrial. Between 647 GWe “trendy” and 1,000 GWe “high version”, there are factories, welders, financing, or the absence of them.

At the French level, the framework is clear, around 61 GW today, an extended fleet when relevant, and a “heavy” recovery with six EPR2 supported by preferential public loans, a trajectory designed to deliver the first new installment around 2038 around 2038, if the calendar holds up. Our “backbone” scenario places France between 60 and 80 GW by 2050, low end of the range if we especially extend, top of the range if the EPR2 series really kicks in and if one or two SMR sites find their place close to thermal uses.

What this changes, system in hand, less pressure on long-term storage, more on skilled labor and evacuation networks. A solid controllable base reduces the need for seasonal battery screens, in exchange it is necessary to size lines, stations and flexibility additions to absorb less predictable peaks, data centers, electrolysis, industrial heat pumps. It is a very concrete trade-off, we go from stored gigawatt hours to installed gigawatts, and to their physical integration into territories.

The core of betting is not physics, it's execution. We know how to run reactors for 60 years with very low carbon intensity, we also know how much a first of a series that goes off the rails costs. The switch is played out in unspectacular detail, AI-optimized shutdown schedules, secure supply chains for large components, and worker and engineering schools that piece together complete promotions. Until these conditions are met, the “backbone” remains a slogan. As soon as they are, the serial effect causes delays and risks to fall, as in aeronautics.

Nothing erases blind spots, cooling under water stress with air-cooling towers or dry cooling, end-of-cycle management with deep geological storage that is sized and accepted, local governance where value and transparency are shared, otherwise nothing is anchored. But this scenario does not sell “all nuclear”, it proposes a framework where wind and solar remain useful for pinching the peaks and decarbonizing cheap electricity on sunny days while the network holds everything together.

If this nuclear backbone materializes, the 2050 mix no longer needs a “battery wall” to survive winters, but it needs pace, workshops that rotate, interconnections that arise, teams that form. It is a promise of stability in a more electric world provided we accept that the real difficulty is no longer technological, it is industrial and social.

Scenario “Renewables en madness”

Here, we are counting on a massive increase in solar and wind power, made viable by large-scale networks, storage over several time horizons and a demand that has become active.

At sunrise, the plain shimmers. Acres of signs follow the sun with the patience of a sunflower. Offshore, white masts pierce the mist, their blades wrest electricity from the wind that did not exist the minute before. This world moves quickly, parks that emerge in eighteen months, roofs that are equipped at the scale of a neighborhood, fields that become agrivoltaic. The network engineer no longer has an on/off button, he has a weather forecast.

The bet is simple to formulate, titanic to fulfill, to flood the system with solar and wind power, then smooth out their moods through storage and smart grids. The IEA already promises a tripling of capacities by 2030, the “full throttle” version pushes the cursor up to 12,000—18,000 GW of renewable energy accumulated in 2050, while nuclear power, relegated to the background, provides a few controllable pockets, 400—500 GW, where inertia is precious. The logic is not dogmatic, it is kinetic, the renewable unfolds faster than everything else.

In France, the diagram is drawn at full size. On the Atlantic coast, offshore is anchored to the bottom or floats above great depths. Inland, roofs absorb an increasing portion of daytime demand, while ground parks combine with agriculture or land on wastelands. RTE strengthens the interconnections to pool hazards, export the surplus at noon, import the wind from the North when the anticyclone falls asleep. Seen from an airplane, Europe becomes an HVDC network that connects pockets of wind and sun like an energy TGV network.

All that's left is to tame the time. Here, storage is not a gimmick, it's a vital organ. The batteries smooth the evenings and the small wind holes, the WWTPs, reversible dams, swallow up the sunny weekends to spit them out on Monday, more deeply, hydrogen and thermal tanks take over to spend the gray weeks in winter. The other leg is demand, buildings that overheat the day before to relax the next day, factories that postpone a drying cycle, electric cars that recharge when production abounds and release a trickle when the network grit its teeth. Millions of objects become a virtual power plant controlled by software, the algorithms guess the clouds before they arrive.

On the ground, the revolution is very material. You need copper, transformers, inverters, kilometers of cable and land. A solar gigawatt requires tens of km², offshore wind reduces the ground footprint, but adds challenges for ports and ships.

The economy follows a different grammar. The more renewables there are, the more surpluses peaks occur these June afternoons when we no longer know what to do with so much sun. rather than restrain, we learn to value. Episodic electrolysis to make hydrogen. Industrial refrigeration stored in ice tanks. Heat stored in molten salt. Data center calculations scheduled for peak hours. Electricity ceases to be a tight wire. It becomes a raw material that is shaped.

The dark side is well known, permits that last forever, materials under tension, networks that do not advance at the same pace as parks, windless winters if the gas backup is maintained. In this scenario, AI is not a veneer, it is the conductor who avoids cacophony, fine forecasts, dynamic pricing, real-time trade-offs between production, storage and deletion. When it works, magic happens, marginal costs very low in summer, electrification that accelerates, and dependence on imported fuels is reduced. When things stall, we create disorder, queues at the connection, losses, political brakes.

This “renewable madness” is not a fairy tale. It is an obstacle course where we win in quantity and mesh more than in the single piece, where we move the difficulty from the reactor to the territory, where the question is not “can we produce” but “can we connect, store, accept”. If it succeeds, the system becomes flexible, reversible, and remarkably inexpensive as soon as the sun and the wind play their part. If it fails, it does not fail for lack of engineering, it fails for lack of a set.

Two paths, two requirements. The “backbone” requires industry and time, the “crazy renewables” require territory and networks. In real life, countries don't pick sides, they compose. Let's get into the polyphonic mix, the one that adds up strengths and neutralizes weaknesses.

“Polyphonic Mix” scenario: the harmony of opposites

Neither nuclear dogma, nor solar rush, this scenario assumes complementarity, nuclear foundation, renewable dynamics, memory through storage, coordination by AI.

The most credible future has not chosen one side, it harmonizes the two. This “polyphonic mix” scenario imagines a world that no longer seeks technological purity, but dynamic balance, a mosaic of solutions, each playing its right note in an ensemble in constant tension.

Globally, the curves intersect, solar and wind dominate growth, with nearly 70% of new capacity installed each year, while nuclear power maintains a stable presence around 700 to 800 GWe, enough to stabilize the networks and provide the basis for the mix. Geothermal energy adds a steady low note, a whisper of continuous heat that supports sunless winters. Hydraulics, hydrogen and biomass complete the set, not as extras, but as nuanced instruments. And the AI, like an invisible maestro, synchronizes the flows to the millisecond, balancing even before a dissonance occurs.

Balance in practice
Let's take a 2045 day. At 11 am, the Spanish sun is overflowing, electrolysis is filling salt caves in the south of France. At 7 pm, the Danish wind took over on the north facade. Meanwhile, French nuclear power plants maintain a constant base, the continuous bass of the orchestra, while the alpine dams adjust to smooth the transitions. Everything is connected, synchronized, distributed. The network is breathing at the pace of the planet.

In this configuration, nuclear becomes the framework, renewable the living ornament, the living ornament, storage, memory, geothermal, slow pulsation, and AI, the consciousness of the system. We are no longer talking about production, but about energy orchestration.

An economy of complementarity
The major shift in the “polyphonic mix” is not only technical, it is economic. Nuclear power plants, which are expensive to build but cheap to operate, provide stable and predictable electricity. Renewables deliver a cheap flow when the weather allows it. Between the two, flexible markets are being invented, individuals paid for a few kilowatt hours of erasure, manufacturers who optimize their processes according to the price signal, electric vehicles that become rolling batteries.

This model reduces peaks, values troughs, and crushes systemic costs. The network is becoming an instant energy marketplace. In some regions, energy cooperatives are emerging, neighborhoods with solar panels, regional micro-SMRs, shared batteries. Energy is territorialized, it becomes visible again, almost tangible.

The challenges of compromise
But harmony does not erase dissonances, and political tensions remain. Who decides on investment priorities, who finances redundancy, how to distribute value between centralized production and local actors. A “polyphonic mix” is demanding, it requires coordination, governance and trust. States must learn to plan without freezing, to delegate without losing control. And citizens, to understand that perfection does not exist, only moving balances to be maintained collectively.

“What's new is not technology, it's energy diplomacy, power grids are becoming political networks.”

Energy as a culture
This scenario is a change of perspective, energy ceases to be a sector, it becomes a culture. We produce it, we share it, we pilot it. It crosses cities like a common language. The roofs speak to the wind, the rivers respond to the data centers, the reactors keep up with the times. The mix is no longer a school battle, it's a living score where every note counts.

In 2050, the world of energy will not be binary, it will be polyphonic, made of fragile balance and inventive resilience. The risk is no longer of running out of watts, but of lacking the link between those who produce, store and consume them.

Because above this terrestrial symphony already hovers another horizon, fusion, space solar and super-deep geothermal energy, technologies that, tomorrow, could take our energy orchestra to a completely different octave.

2100 and beyond, the age of tame fires

The century is closing, but the quest continues. As the Earth becomes electrified, another promise is needed: that of new fires, denser, cleaner, closer to the source of all heat, the stars. Humanity, after learning to break atoms, is now trying to reunite them.

Fusion, taming the Sun

Under the silver sheet metal of a building in Cadarache, in Provence, thousands of technicians are busy around a giant ring. ITER, the global project born out of a utopia in the 1980s, has worn out, but it has stuck. Around the middle of the century, the first deuterium-tritium plasmas ignited in the magnetic core. It is not yet a power plant, but a proof of physics on a global scale, the energy of a star contained for a few seconds in a magnetic field.

At the same time, a generation of private start-ups has reinvented the dream. Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Helion, Renaissance Fusion, and others miniaturize the machine. High-field superconducting magnets, optimized geometries, compact systems worthy of jet engines, fusion is leaving laboratories for industrial halls. Their prototypes still only feed local demonstrators, but the trajectory is clear: if fission built the 20th century, fusion could frame the 21st century.

“We are the first to make stars on the ground,” smiles a Helion engineer. “The day they stay on for more than an hour, everything will change, energy will stop being scarce.”

If a compact breakthrough occurs, these “stars in a jar” could be established in urban areas. What remains is the need for safety, evolving standards and activated materials to be managed without compromise.

Super-deep geothermal energy, piercing the planet

While some look up at the sky, others pierce Earth. With advanced drills and very high temperature alloys, super-deep geothermal energy plunges to about twenty kilometers, where the crust borders on 500°C. These “magmatic straws” offer an almost continuous heat, day and night, independent of climate.

Iceland, a historic pioneer, exports its know-how to Kenya and Indonesia. In Europe, France and Switzerland explore granite basins with caution, because at great depths, heat flirts with seismicity. But progress is real: by 2090, some thirty cities are supplying their heat network through super-deep sinks, vertical columns where a pressurized fluid that comes out as dry steam circulates. Subterranean, silent, local energy, a perfect counterfield to space solar. Card joker, chronic droughts could accelerate this “dry” sector, but the long-term stability of materials remains a barrier.

Space solar, light without night

‍

Above the stratosphere, solar platforms orbit and capture the Sun constantly. Once extravagant projects are becoming believable thanks to reusable launchers and ultra-lightweight microwave antennas.

Around 2080, a first orbital power plant sends up to 1 GW to Earth via a beam around 2.45 GHz, converted into electricity on the ground. No CO₂, no clouds, no night. The images of this “blue beam” illuminating the Pacific become the symbol of a humanity that harnesses the light.

The risk is no longer technical, it is becoming political. Who controls these “artificial suns”? Who owns the light? Energy, once a matter of carbon and copper, is becoming a question of orbit and sovereignty.

Natural application, converting this flow into green hydrogen by electrolysis, then into synthetic fuels for aviation without fossil carbon.

Network intelligence, the era of conscious flows

On Earth, networks become living organisms. Every city, every home, every battery communicates in real time. AI is no longer a tool, it's a cognitive infrastructure that balances, anticipates, and repairs. Advanced models predict “electrical weather” for several days; autonomous systems detect micro-failures before they exist.

The network manages itself, learns from its mistakes, and adjusts its flows like a heart regulates its tension.

A free energy humanity

If energy becomes almost infinite, that's not the end of the story. It is a new relationship with the world. When the energy constraint disappears, others emerge, raw materials, water, attention, meaning. Producing without counting is not enough; we will have to think of the limit differently, not as a lack, but as a balance.

Between 2100 and 2200, energy will have stopped being a fight for survival. It will become an art of adjustment, a symphony of flow between Earth and sky, between fire and code.

And maybe then we will understand that real progress was not in taming the sun, but in learning to live in its light.

Conclusion, building the orchestra of tomorrow

Along these lines, we have traveled through an energy system in metamorphosis, from the realities of today to the horizons of 2100. In the end, the future of energy is not a battle between nuclear and alternatives, it is a symphony where each instrument, controllable like nuclear or hydro, intermittent like wind and solar, stored like batteries or hydrogen, stored like batteries or hydrogen, finds its own score. It is not a triumphant solo, it is a harmonious whole, where miniaturization of reactors, intelligent networks and well-dimensioned storage agree for a world without fossil carbon without losing reliability. At Fractales, this vision amazes us, it transforms complexity into opportunity, reminding us that wonder is the first step towards knowledge and that our boundless curiosity pushes us to decipher these revolutions in order to better shape them.

So it's up to everyone to play. Follow the indicators, question the myths, observe the weak signals, the weak signals, relevant urban mini-reactors, learning networks, fusion that is progressing, deep geothermal energy that whispers under our feet. The future is built as much by technology as by our daily choices, those of innovators, decision-makers and vigilant citizens.

The world moves quickly, but with the right keys to reading it, you no longer have to endure it, you compose it. Because the energy of the future will not only be the energy we produce, but the energy we understand. It is a positive, resilient future, where energy serves humans rather than constraining them.

And as the prospectivist Bertrand Piccard often says,
“It is not by refusing change that we create the future, it is by making it desirable.”

‍